Wednesday, May 25, 2011

JOB ANALYSIS- Why and How?

HR's basic function is to recruit ..recruit and again recruit .. We hire , attrition occurs and we re-hire...Every thing is to hire and retain employees...But wait do we know who we want and for what we want him/her.. To reach to this very point we do job analysis..
Job analysis : Is analysing the job . Its a job document the company prepares to lure the talent.Just like we create our resume to lure good organizations and good profile.

It's like getting married ..Looking for a girl :First thing even before seeing the girl is what type of girl I want :  her looks, qualification, family background . This is the job specification in case of Job analysis , telling us about our pre-requisites on the basis of which a consultant ( here a marriage consultant) does the initial match making.


Job Description is what the candiate will be expected to do when he/she after joining the organization.

Let's suppose I am a recruiter , and I am looking for a profile through job portal.First thing I will enter will be the designation of the candidate, his experience and industry , eductional qualification and broad role (i.e HR, Sales, Finance etc.). Then after resumes appear I will look for resumes with organizations which are suitable for the industry I am recruiting for . Next, in the resume of any person I will look whether he/she is performing the role I am recruiting for .


HOW DO WE ANALYZE JOB
1. Questionnaire - Questionnaire has 6 different forms :
(a) PAQ (Position Analysis Questionnaire) :PAQ model developed by McCormick, Jeanneret, and Mecham (1972), is a structured instrument of job analysis to measure job characteristics and relate them to human characteristics.It consists of 195 job elements that describe generic human work.
  • Interpersonal activities (36 elements),
  • Work situation and job context (19 elements, and
  • Miscellaneous aspects (41 elements)
  •  Information input (35 elements),
  • Mental processes (14 elements),
  • Work output (49 elements),
(b) Functional Job Analysis
(c) Work Profilling System
(d) Fisherman Job Analysis Method
(e) MOSAIC Model
(f) Common Metric Questionnaire

2. Observation - Via time and motion study, general/direct observation technique, critical incident technique one can analyze the job. General observation will help us determine general job characteristics while time and motion study is in-depth role analysis including the time devoted by a person/role holder to complete the particular responsibility of his/her job.
Observation of work activities and worker behaviors is a method of job analysis which can be used independently or in combination with other methods of job analysis. Three methods of job analysis based on observation are: (1) direct observation; (2) work methods analysis, including time and motion study and micro-motion analysis; and (3) the critical incident technique. Though they employ the same method, these methods differ in terms of who does the observing, what is observed, and how it is observed.
Direct observation. Using direct observation, a person conducting the analysis simply observes employees in the performance of their duties, recording observations as they are made. The observer either takes general notes or works from a form which has structured categories for comment. Everything is observed: what the worker accomplishes, what equipment is used, what the work environment is like, and any other factors relevant to the job. Direct observation methods have certain natural limitations for job analysis purposes. First, they cannot capture the mental aspects of jobs, such as decision making or planning, since mental processes are not observable. Second, observation methods can provide little information relating to personal requirements for various jobs because this kind of information is also not readily observable. Thus, observation methods provide little information on which to base job specifications.
Work methods analysis. A sophisticated observation method, work methods analysis is used to describe manual and repetitive production jobs, such as factory or assembly-line jobs. These methods are used by industrial engineers to determine standard rates of production which are used to set pay rates. Two types of work methods analysis are time and motion study and micro-motion analysis. In time and motion studies, an industrial engineer observes and records each activity of a worker, using a stopwatch to note the time it takes to perform separate elements of the job. Micro-motion analysis uses a movie camera to record worker activities. Films are analyzed to discover acceptable ways of accomplishing tasks and to set standards relating to how long certain tasks should take. Such data are especially useful for developing training programs and setting pay rates.
The critical incident technique involves observation and recording of examples of particularly effective or ineffective behaviors. Behaviors are judged to be "effective" or "ineffective" in terms of results produced by the behavior. The following information should be recorded for each "critical incident" of behavior: (1) what led up to the incident and the situation in which it occurred; (2) exactly what the employee did that was particularly effective or ineffective; (3) the perceived consequences or results of the behavior; and (4) a judgment as to the degree of control an employee had over the results his or her behavior produced (to what degree should the employee be held responsible for what resulted


3. Other Methods : Other Methods are essay writing, diary writing by the employee himself of his work .Task incentory method, Competency Profilling.

The above methods are generally used . But, the method usually used is copy pasting from already existing job descriptions for the role on internet and by doing organization comparitive analysis for job specification - by benchmarking.





Saturday, October 10, 2009

What really is motivation? - Theories of Motivation (PART 1)



Motivation ,a commonly discussed noun.Motivation is the process of getting energized to reach our targets.Thus, the very basis of getting motivated is having well defined , clear , unambiguous ,challenging yet achievable and measurable targets.Motivation is a drive that compels one to act because human behavior is directed toward some goal. Motivation is intrinsic (internal); it comes from within based on personal interests, desires, and need for fulfillment. However, extrinsic (external) factors such as rewards, praise, and promotions also influence motivation.
One simply cannot say ," I am self-motivated". It all depends, for what he/she is talking about. Even self-motivation is outcome /reward / goal oriented. For example, a person says he is self motivated to lose more weight if his/her weight reduce to the desired target he/she had set earlier.

Motivation ,as known and said, has two factors : intrinsic factors and extrinsic factors ; around which the theories of motivation has been laid down
  • Maslow’s Hierarchy of Need : The five needs (or levels of need) grouped in lower order need and higher order need. Physiological and safety need are lower order need ; and; social , self-esteem and self-actualization are higher order need. For every stage of life-cycle or cycle of a particular relationship in which we enter; the internal components to satisfy each of the five levels are different and thus begin from the lower level again. In some cases though, lower level needs may be same and thus only higher order needs begin from starting .For e.g.  when you enter into a new relationship let’s say you are to get married then your hierarchy will start from the lowest level to the highest level. But, the point to remember here is you have to be motivated first for the physiological need , once satisfied then only you can be motivated to satisfy safety need. ONLY ONE MAJOR SATISFIER AT A TIME.
Let’s take our friends example who joined FORE School of Management. The first thing their parents enquired after depositing the first draft was about the hostel. And since they don’t have a good one, the first priority was to search for one that too near --PHYSIOLOGICAL NEED
Then if we find a house our parents check about the security there is in terms of guard and the locality as such ,at the same time they open an account whose access is given to us via ATM or give us debit or credit card for providing us financial security --SAFETY NEED.
Then after all this we stay there and come to college and try to portray an image which will be accepted socially to make friends. Also, try  to be accepted by the college professors as well. --SOCIAL NEED
Now, even at the time of choosing our friends we try to make friends depending on how we want to be seen. Then via activities like games, being a topper, or by being quiet …, we try to get recognition .Everyone has a different way of getting valued. --SELF-ESTEEM NEED
After satisfying all the above needs in the first two-three trimester, we try to maximize our potential and abilities for the final motive we have .This we through by choosing our elective as per our interest and abilities and fine tuning them. And, then by gaining experience and further fine-tuning our skills through various training -- SELF-ACTUALIZATION NEED
This is clear from this for every new relationship or stage we start from the basic lower level need to attain the highest level need. Now, in next post I’ll try to find whether these levels are as said attained in the order or can one be motivated on all the levels simultaneously.

Friday, October 2, 2009

Performance Management System & Performance Appraisal - Different ?

The funny thing about most of the Human Resource terms is how ambiguous they sound to be but yet how clear the difference is between them .After writing about how training differs from development, here in I'll give an insight i learnt from my first two classes of fifth semester at FORE School of Management in Performance Management.Two words which are sometimes misunderstood as one, Performance Management System and Performance Appraisal.

Let's see a situation, a marketing manager has to appraise (for the annual appraisal ) his subordinates who work in the field and thus he has no supervision over the activities on day-to-day basis.He only knows that whether they have been able to meet the monthly target or not.So, he thinks that employee appraisal form is a pain in his neck and decides to give a good rating to all to make all his subordinates happy and keep them motivated.And, he also thinks whatever rating he gives they wont be rewarded.And, the appraisal form has variables that they cannot control.

So first i thought it was all about the performance appraisal form not properly made, the necessity and usefulness of the appraisal not conveyed to the managers adequately.And, ya the manager should keep a check on the employees day-to-day performance.But, after the first session i was actually able to look deeper into the systems problem in place.The system of performance management is not a one time (annual, quarter ) thing .The PMS system in the case was not on par of some of the two basic elements of a PMS , like it evaluated targets which were based on some uncontrollable factors (territory, product etc.) and it was done by the manager who had no insight of the employees day-to-day activity (SHOULD BE DONE BY ONE WHO OVERSEES THE WORK DAILY).And, ya no defined objectives (KRA's) for the employees to work upon apart from the sales target.

One easiest way to remember that PMS & PA are different is that PA is a part of the PMS process.Just like an employee has to go through various trainings for the development, similarly, PA is one of the step for maintaining current performance and improving on for future.

Through PMS we again try to build upon the competencies ( all the main activity of HR department revolves around competency building).PA identifies competence shown in the past on which you will get rewarded and PMS will further add one future orientation of building on where you lack or have potential.Though PMS is an HR process but the execution and control part is by the line supervisors ( HR only acts as a facilitator with periodic review "PRD's").The PA part of PMS though is the responsibility of HR department with the help of all employees. PA is that part of PMS which gives foundation for Training & Development and future KRA's.

PA is though a part of PMS but its like the backbone of PMS , PA can make or break a PMS.

How Training differs from Development?

Training & Development are two words used together almost in every organization .Do we know that these two words cannot be used interchangeably. They are just like covering a work bad done for current but development is doing the work proficiently to be rewarded.

Training is a short-term ( a onetime thing) with more scope imparting the currently required competencies ( focus on technical and mechanical aspect).On the other hand, development is a continuous process with more emphasis on conceptual and philosophical knowledge ( managerial and enabling competencies).The trainees are generally the non-managerial personnel(s), but, the participants in development programs are usually managerial personnel.

What probes my mind is that why are only managerial personnel given a chance for development? Why not all the employees get an equal share of developing themselves, since they all contribute to the growth of the organization asked the same to the my mentee during my summer training and I got a reply that the level of contribution and the future growth opportunities differ for each of them. According to me an employee’s cost to the company compared to the profit generated by him is one major factor which decides an employee should go for development programs or not.

Development is a proactive process wherein the company tries to fill in the future gaps that may appear due to a change in the position of the employee, his working conditions , technology etc.. . But, since training needs are derived from the past performances to improve on to the current capabilities of an employee, it is a reactive process. We though see the current capabilities in both training and development, but in case of development , the focus is on the potential an employee has rather than the requirements the employee has to fulfill to sustain his job and therefore his growth in the organization.

A development plan is usually for 5 years( the employee development plan), like our government’s 5 year plan with the difference in implementation. It describes the current competency level of an employee and will also map the potential the employee has and the competencies level he/she will be able to reach as per the plan.

In case of training, the needs come through 3 levels of analysis i.e. organizational analysis , operational analysis and person analysis. These tell us the gap between expected and actual performance. Then a sheet is drafted where in all the employees training need are jotted after which the training calendar for the year and budget are finalized in a meeting. Then a monthly calendar with schedules are drafted with all details of the program with costs ( in case of outbound).Then the training evaluation is done generally by the famous Kirkpatrick Model.

Listing out the differences is easy but here is the difficult part the similarities, training and development both focus on competencies , need a support from the employee and his supervisor ( or management in case of development),can be initiated by the employee or the employer, the ultimate focus of each is to make competitive employees which drive performance.

The most important part is the type of culture and the climate in the organization .A learning culture is important for the actual implementation of the laid down policies and procedures.